9/15/2023 0 Comments Mbti reliability and validity![]() ![]() A number of concerns have been raised regarding the psychometric properties of the MBTI ( Boyle, 1995 McCrae & Costa, 1989). References to some (hardly accessible) publications on studies in non-US populations have also been provided. Only (satisfactory) data from monocultural studies were reported by McCaulley and Moody (2008). The theoretical types have nonetheless been replicated in all cultures examined, with varying distribution ( McCaulley & Moody, 2008). However, there are no direct examinations of cross-cultural equivalence in a factor-analytic and DIF framework. ![]() It has been translated into more than 30 languages, of which over 10 versions are approved by the publisher. The MBTI has been claimed to be ‘the most widely used personality inventory in the world’ ( McCaulley & Moody, 2008, p. Rather than sum scores indicating standing on an underlying trait, the scales provide type assignments. The instrument has multiple forms with different scoring formats. The MBTI has been developed to measure the assignment of individuals into one of 16 personality types (derived from the combination of four dichotomous attitudes or functioning styles: Extraversion–Introversion, Judgment–Perception, Thinking–Feeling, and Sensing–Intuition) inspired from Jung’s (1921/1971) theory. van de Vijver, in Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs, 2015 Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |